Last year, Anil Dash got married: “The defining trait of marriage in these contexts is that the commitment comes first. It doesn’t occur to most people to get upset that they don’t get to choose their siblings; You just love your brother or sister, or you try to, and you fight sometimes and you disagree, and then you get over it, and that’s what family is about. And in some ways, marriage can be like that, too. There’s a liberation in knowing you don’t have an easy out: You know you’re going to make it work, and you’re not going to give up.”

I’ve just re-read a 2002 interview of Neal Stephenson by _Reason_ magazine, and recommend it. Stephenson is, as always, an interesting subject. Choice bit: “Since our prosperity and our military security for the last three or four generations have been rooted in science and technology, it would therefore seem that we’re coming to the end of one era and about to move into another. Whether it’s going to be better or worse is difficult for me to say. The obvious guess would be “worse.” If I really wanted to turn this into a jeremiad, I could hold forth on that for a while. But as mentioned before, this country has always found a new way to move forward and be prosperous. So maybe we’ll get lucky again. In the meantime, efforts to predict the future by extrapolating trends in the world of science and technology are apt to feel a lot less compelling than they might have in 1955.”

Jacob Weisberg argues that the _NYTimes_ should not have published its story about CIA tracking of transactions made through the international bank clearinghouse known as Swift. His points are sound, but I suspect part of the reason the _Times_ and others published the story over government objections was because they’ve heard the same objections time and again to stories about programs that are less effective, far more legally questionable, and much more impactful to the public discourse. By playing all their cards in defense of programs far more pernicious (and less legal), the government lost any standing it had to reasonably argue for this story to be killed.

Current and former Berkmanites Derek Bambauer, William McGeveran, and Tim Armstrong are blogging up at storm at their newish Info/Law blog. Its too much for me to keep up with on a regular basis, but their commentary is interesting and informative. If you’re interested in law related to tech and the internet, give it a looksie.

In my final post on this issue for now, Mark Pilgrim responds to John Gruber and makes some excellent points about long-term data retention. As someone worried about data life, I really should have been thinking about these things when I wrote my post. I’m still kicking myself for saving all my music in AAC rather than MP3 (since still no one but Apple is really supporting AAC), not to mention all the old documents in various formats that I can’t open anymore. Conclusion: good arguments all around, Mark’s are more compelling, in my view and coming from my specific mindset, but may not be more compelling to others, and still on balance I am sticking with the Mac and just doing what I can to avoid lock-in to proprietary formats.